Key Takeaways:
Wallets containing 10 or more BTC now dominate 82.5% of the total Bitcoin supply, leaving a mere 17.5% for retail investors.
Institutional buyers, such as Strategy, may capture up to 50% of newly mined Bitcoin, heightening scarcity.
The increasing centralization of Bitcoin ownership diverges from the original principles set forth by Satoshi Nakamoto.
According to a recent report by Santiment, published on May 13, a significant portion of the Bitcoin market is becoming increasingly controlled by large-scale holders. Wallets that possess at least 10 BTC, valued at around $1 million, now account for over 82% of all Bitcoin that has been mined to date.
The Influence of Large Bitcoin Wallets on Market Liquidity
The Santiment analysis reveals a growing concentration of Bitcoin among wealthy institutional investors and a select group of prominent traders.
From Trump’s Strategic Bitcoin Reserve to ongoing retail and mining sell-offs, our latest insights explore how Bitcoin’s— and the broader cryptocurrency ecosystem’s—future is being reshaped. https://t.co/OdVbY5gh41 pic.twitter.com/fqFiheWMa2
— Santiment (@santimentfeed) May 15, 2025
Currently, about 19.86 million Bitcoins have been mined out of a fixed maximum of 21 million. Large holders with at least 100 BTC, which is worth over $10 million, already command 60.84% of the total supply. When considering those wallets with a minimum of 10 BTC, this concentration reaches approximately 82.51%, with less than 18% of Bitcoin now held in wallets containing less than $1 million.
Bitcoin’s total cap remains at 21 million coins, and about 94.57% of that amount has already been mined. Only 1.14 million BTC are left to be released over the next 115 years, and major holders are increasingly acquiring this limited future supply before it becomes available in the general market, adding an additional layer of scarcity beyond Bitcoin’s programmed limits.
Strategy, an influential firm, exemplifies this aggressive acquisition trend. In the previous month, they bought 15,355 BTC and subsequently announced a capital raise plan of $84 billion to bolster further acquisitions.
Shortly after, Strategy purchased another 13,390 Bitcoin. These aggressive moves exert real influence on the Bitcoin supply and market dynamics. Crypto analyst Adam Livingston has termed this phenomenon as creating a “synthetic halving” effect.
Typically, Bitcoin’s reward for miners decreases approximately every four years through a natural halving cycle that limits new coin production, thus enforcing scarcity.
Strategy is synthetically halving Bitcoin and will set the cost of capital for the next 100 years.
Most people think the Bitcoin supply curve is sacred. Fixed. Immutable. Untouchable. They’re wrong.
Strategy is manually rewriting Bitcoin’s scarcity schedule right now with…
— Adam Livingston (@AdamBLiv) April 27, 2025
Major players like Strategy are now driving scarcity more rapidly than what the protocol intends. They achieve this by acquiring substantial quantities of newly mined Bitcoin the moment it becomes available.
Post-2024 halving, miners will only produce 450 BTC per day, which totals merely 13,500 BTC monthly. Given Strategy’s aggressive purchasing efforts, they are coming dangerously close to consuming the entire monthly supply. The implications are significant: with demand increasing and new coins vanishing almost immediately, the market experiences fundamental shifts.
Retail Investors and the ‘Synthetic Halving’ Challenge
The growing concentration of Bitcoin ownership among a few wealthy wallets has profound ramifications for the broader market, particularly for retail investors.
When a vast amount of supply is locked away, liquidity diminishes, leading to more pronounced price fluctuations. This can inflate volatility and hinder the ability of everyday investors to enter or exit their positions at equitable prices.
According to Santiment’s report, wallets holding fewer than 10 BTC collectively control around 3.47 million Bitcoins, equating to approximately $358 billion at current price levels.
This group includes retail investors, miners, and smaller traders—essential components of Bitcoin’s decentralized community. However, as large holders continually absorb more Bitcoin, the situation becomes increasingly lopsided.
During market downturns or moments of uncertainty, retail investors often react by selling to secure profits or mitigate losses. However, these sell-offs create opportunities for wealthier entities who buy up the discounted coins, creating a feedback loop that further centralizes ownership.
The Centralization Paradox of Bitcoin: From Rebellion to Conformity?
In 2008, Satoshi Nakamoto introduced Bitcoin as a decentralized currency aimed at liberating users from the bonds of banks and governmental control.
The original whitepaper was crafted as a rebellion against the failures of the financial system, a system that collapsed that same year, underscoring the perils of centralization. Bitcoin was envisioned as an alternative.
The goal was to prevent any single entity from gaining power; instead, the network would rely on a collective of users and miners to uphold fairness, openness, and resilience.
This was the envisioned promise.
Perhaps Satoshi redirected his focus to other applications of decentralization he found “interesting” at the time; ones that wouldn’t naturally centralize over time.
— Saul (@uptownsaul) April 24, 2025
Fast-forward 17 years, and that promise is fading. The accumulating concentration of Bitcoin in fewer hands mirrors the very financial hierarchy it was intended to dismantle.
If there is no corrective action—whether through broader adoption, redistribution, or changes in policy—Bitcoin risks evolving into yet another asset class dominated by a wealthy minority.
The irony is striking: what began as a tool for financial empowerment may ultimately replicate the very system it sought to overthrow.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
How does supply concentration affect Bitcoin’s price stability?
When a limited number of major holders possess a substantial amount of Bitcoin, they can influence market prices dramatically with just one trade. A buy can lead to price surges, while a sell can trigger declines. This creates increased volatility and makes Bitcoin’s price more unpredictable.
Could regulation force the redistribution of Bitcoin holdings?
As of now, regulation has not focused on redistribution but rather on combating fraud and crime. While authorities can seize coins from malicious actors, enforcing wealth redistribution could lead to complex legal issues.
What strategies can retail investors use to compete?
Retail traders can enhance their competitiveness by monitoring whale movements, utilizing decentralized finance (DeFi) tools, and engaging with trading communities. While large investors may sway the market, smaller, educated traders have the agility to seize early opportunities. In the rapidly changing crypto landscape, knowledge and adaptability can outpace sheer size in significance.
The post Wallets with 10+ BTC Now Control 82% of Bitcoin Supply – Is Scarcity Next? appeared first on Finance Newso.
