Fed Faces Tough Choices Amid Trump’s Tariff Storm

As President Donald Trump rolls out his ambitious tariff initiatives, the Federal Reserve faces a challenging predicament, caught between the dual objectives of controlling inflation and stimulating economic growth—or opting to remain passive and allow the situation to unfold unimpeded.

If the president maintains his stringent trade policies, the economy could experience immediate repercussions, including higher prices and a potential deceleration in growth that may lead to a recession.

This situation poses a dilemma for the Federal Reserve.

The central bank is charged with achieving its dual mandate of promoting maximum employment while keeping inflation in check. If tariffs disrupt these goals, it will be difficult for the Fed to decide whether to lower interest rates to spur growth or increase them to combat inflation, as both choices carry significant risks.

“The challenge for the Fed is that they will have to be highly reactive,” remarked Jonathan Pingle, chief U.S. economist at UBS. “As they observe rising prices, they may hesitate to address any weaknesses in growth that emerge. This situation is likely to complicate their ability to act preemptively.”

Under typical circumstances, the Federal Reserve aims to stay ahead of economic trends.

When signs of rising unemployment appear, the Fed often lowers interest rates to enhance financial conditions, encouraging businesses to hire. Conversely, if a surge in inflation is anticipated, the bank may raise rates to cool demand and stabilize prices.

So, what course of action should be taken when both scenarios manifest simultaneously?

The Fed has not confronted this scenario since the early 1980s when former Chair Paul Volcker prioritized controlling inflation by significantly increasing interest rates, ultimately leading the economy into recession.

Presently, the decision is fraught with difficulty, especially in light of the Federal Reserve’s prior misjudgment in 2021 when rising prices were downplayed as “transitory.” This term has resurfaced to characterize the Fed’s outlook on price increases stemming from tariffs.

“They could find themselves in a precarious position facing significant price hikes, similar to the situation in 2022, where they may feel compelled to react,” Pingle assessed. “For the Fed to address declining growth, they will need to wait until the weakening trend is undeniable and clearly necessitates action.”

The Trump administration has framed the tariffs as beneficial for growth and a means to curb inflation, though officials concede that some turbulence might be expected ahead.

“It’s time to change the rules to ensure they favor the United States,” stated Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick in a Thursday interview. “We must shift our support from the global community to American labor.”

Nonetheless, achieving this shift may take considerable time, as Lutnick himself acknowledged that the administration seeks to fundamentally restructure the global economy.

In response to Trump’s recent tariffs announcement, many economists on Wall Street, including Pingle, are adjusting their forecasts regarding the potential fallout.

The prevailing sentiment suggests that if the tariffs are not negotiated down, they are likely to stifle economic growth, potentially leading to stagnation or recession, while core inflation is projected to exceed 3% by 2025, with some estimates even reaching 5%. This projection diverges significantly from the Federal Reserve’s inflation target of 2%.

“With price stability not fully established, and tariffs looming as a potential inflationary threat, policymakers might find it challenging to offer the monetary support that growth increasingly demands, possibly preventing them from cutting rates altogether,” analyzed Seema Shah, chief global strategist at Principal Asset Management.

In light of market reactions such as Thursday’s downturn, traders have escalated their expectations that the Federal Reserve will prioritize growth support over inflation control.

The reaction has led to increased speculation that the Fed will implement aggressive rate cuts this year, with traders betting on multiple quarter-percentage-point reductions, according to the CME Group’s FedWatch futures tracker.

However, Shah indicated that “the path to easing has narrowed and become more uncertain.”

Meanwhile, Federal Reserve officials have not indicated any imminent intention to cut rates.

In a speech on Thursday, Vice Chair Philip Jefferson reiterated the Fed’s stance, emphasizing the absence of urgency to adjust the policy rate further. He asserted that the current approach is suitably aligned with the risks and uncertainties encountered by the Fed in pursuit of its dual mandate.

Expanding on that cautious sentiment, Governor Adriana Kugler remarked on Wednesday after Trump’s tariff announcement that she anticipates the Fed will maintain its current position until the economic landscape becomes clearer.

“I will support keeping the present policy rate steady as long as the risks of inflation persist and while economic activity and employment remain stable,” Kugler stated, while also expressing strong support for the March decision to keep the Fed’s benchmark rate unchanged.

Get Your Ticket to Pro LIVE

Join us at the New York Stock Exchange!

Uncertain markets? Gain an edge with Finance Newso Pro LIVE, an exclusive, inaugural event at the historic New York Stock Exchange.