The Supreme Court ruled on Monday in favor of allowing the Trump administration to recommence expedited deportations of specific immigrants to nations other than their countries of origin without prior notice or the opportunity to contest such actions based on potential risks of torture or death.
This decision nullified an injunction put in place by a federal District Court in Massachusetts back in April, which had prohibited the implementation of the practice that originated from an executive order signed by President Donald Trump in January.
The Supreme Court’s ruling will remain effective while the administration’s appeal progresses through the judicial system.
Notably, the court’s three liberal justices expressed dissent regarding the decision.
“When human lives are at stake, it is prudent to approach the situation with caution,” wrote Justice Sonia Sotomayor, one of the dissenting justices.
She elaborated, stating, “In this instance, the government chose to act recklessly.” Sotomayor referenced a previous case involving one plaintiff who was deported to Guatemala despite a ruling from an Immigration Judge that indicated he faced a probable risk of torture. Additionally, she noted that the government disregarded a court ruling when it deported six individuals to South Sudan, a country deemed too perilous for all but essential personnel by the State Department.
Sotomayor further remarked, “A vigilant District Court’s prompt intervention narrowly averted a third round of unlawful deportations to Libya,” highlighting the critical role of lower courts in managing such impactful cases.
“Rather than allowing our esteemed colleagues in the District Court to navigate this complex litigation with the necessary care, this Court has chosen to intervene and grant the government emergency relief from an order it has systematically violated,” she stated.
“I cannot endorse such a flagrant misuse of the Court’s equitable discretion.”
This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.
